|
Impriosonment
On May 10, 1969, after a year
of planning, Atterberry and a fellow POW, John A. Dramesi, made
an almost miraculous escape from prison. The two slipped through
the roof and traveled three miles over 12 hours, but were
recaptured.
Dramesi recalls the torture he
could not speak of for many months. For the escape attempt,
Dramesi was put face down on a table, and while one guard held
his head, two others beat him with a four foot length of rubber
taken from an old automobile tire. They also slapped him
repeatedly in the face. This went on for days, in ninety-minute
sessions, after which the left side of Dramesi's head was swelled
up like a pumpkin. They also put Dramesi on a bread and water
diet for 30 days. At other times during the next two weeks,
Dramesi's arms were bound tightly together behind him and his
wrists and ankles cuffed in heavy irons. A rope was looped around
a two-inch-thick bar attached to his ankle irons, taken around
his shoulders and his head drawn between his knees.
He was held in this position
for 24 hours without sleep. His circulation impaired, the flesh
on his ankles died, and he still bears the scars. After two
weeks, the Vietnamese realized he might lose his feet, so they
removed the irons and treated the wounds, but replaced them.
Dramesi wore the irons continuously for 6 months, removing them
only once a week when allowed to wash.
After 38 days of this torture,
Dramesi was near death.
When Dramesi and Atterberry
were recaptured, one of the other POWs recalls shaking
Atterberry's hand. This was the last time he was seen by any
Americans. Like Dramesi, Atterberry was tortured, but Atterberry
did not survive. The Vietnamese told other POWs that Atterberry
died of an "unusual disease." The POWs knew the disease was
attempting to escape.
Not only Dramesi and Atterberry
were punished. The entire POW populace was systematically worked
over. After the episode was over, the senior officers outlawed
further escape attempts unless they could meet a set of stringent
conditions, including outside help. Planning escapes did not
cease, but the actual attempts were put on hold. This is an
excellent example of how the Code of Conduct was "bent" to the
circumstances at hand. A necessary modification was made to
ensure the survival of the prisoners; it having been determined
that it was impossible to follow the Code literally under the
circumstances.
The result of the Vietnam
experience was a "new" code, the same in letter, but different in
spirit and intent than the pre-Vietnam version. Most agree it is
a more realistic form of guidance, and it stresses community
organization and a chain of command. It releases the POW from the
"die-before-you-talk" syndrome that brought so many to personal
shame in Vietnam when they were finally broken. (And all of those
put to the test who survived were broken.)
Returned POWs have a special
place in their hearts for Atterberry and each of them knows what
happened to Atterberry could have happened to any of them, and in
many cases, nearly did.
|